How Atlas comparisons work.
Comparisons are built on source completeness, location clarity, provider response paths, and public documentation — never pay-to-play.
What we assess.
Source completeness, location clarity, and last-verified dates for every profile.
Clinic-level outcome context with reporting year and cycle counts, where matched.
Every profile includes a clear way to flag outdated or incorrect information.
Review context appears only when source documents cross-check — never unverified claims.
Providers and readers can flag outdated or incorrect information on every list, and each update is checked before publishing.
Budget, match, readiness
Move from Atlas research to a coordinator-reviewed plan
Use the standards page to understand the evidence, then let Patriot connect the provider, law, clinic, budget, escrow, insurance, and timing questions into one coordinated plan.
First step
Readiness quiz
Review
Coordinator-reviewed plan
Next step
Coordinator follow-up
High-intent next step
The readiness quiz gives the team enough context to review budget, state-law, clinic, and matching questions before a coordinator call.
How Atlas references work.
Provider comparisons use public-reference completeness, location clarity, profile update paths, state/metro context, and role-specific public information.
How reference standards become public pages.
The methodology page turns the Atlas from a directory into a governed research surface visitors can understand.
Provider names, locations, role labels, websites, and official references are checked before page copy is trusted.
Review details need a public reference, value, count, and checked date before they appear on a provider profile.
Clinic context, counsel fit, evaluator routing, escrow, and insurance details are not blended into one score.
Every profile keeps an update path so outdated facts can be reviewed before public pages change.
Open provider directoryWhat we measure
Public reference coverage, location clarity, service relevance, metro context, profile update paths, and attributed review details.
Clinic outcome details
CDC outcomes appear as clinic-level details with reporting year, cycles, and SART membership when matched.
Provider response
Every profile includes an update or claim path before profile changes are made.
Reference rules
Review details appear only when a reference link, value, count, and checked date are present.
Current Atlas comparisons.
California surrogacy-friendly fertility clinic shortlist
Shortlist ordered by reference completeness, location clarity, accessible public references, attributed review details, and CDC ART clinic details where matched.
Southern California clinic comparison for intended parents using a GC
Shortlist ordered by reference completeness, location clarity, accessible public references, attributed review details, and CDC ART clinic details where matched.
Texas surrogacy-friendly fertility clinic shortlist
Shortlist ordered by reference completeness, location clarity, accessible public references, attributed review details, and CDC ART clinic details where matched.
California reproductive attorney directory
Shortlist ordered by reference completeness, location clarity, accessible public references, attributed review details, and CDC ART clinic details where matched.
Texas reproductive attorney directory
Shortlist ordered by reference completeness, location clarity, accessible public references, attributed review details, and CDC ART clinic details where matched.
New York / Tri-State clinic and attorney coordination guide
Shortlist ordered by reference completeness, location clarity, accessible public references, attributed review details, and CDC ART clinic details where matched.
When reference details can display.
Google review details must include a reference link, rating value, review count, and checked date.
Third-party review details are shown only when the reference can be attributed clearly and safely.
CDC clinic details are clinic-specific and must include reporting year, reference link, checked date, cycles, and match confidence.
Every provider profile keeps an update path for outdated facts, reference mismatches, or attribution concerns.
Reference standards
How provider information is checked
The Atlas joins public provider facts with reviewed reference links, checked dates, role-specific planning context, and an update workflow before public facts change.
Last checked 2026-06-02.
Provider pages show public facts, reviewed dates, and reference links in plain language.
Clinic outcomes stay separate from review ratings because case mix and patient history matter.
Attorney and evaluator pages never use clinic outcome fields as comparison metrics.
Profile updates go through the profile form before public facts change.
Budget, match, readiness
Move from Atlas research to a coordinator-reviewed plan
Use the standards page to understand the evidence, then let Patriot connect the provider, law, clinic, budget, escrow, insurance, and timing questions into one coordinated plan.
First step
Readiness quiz
Review
Coordinator-reviewed plan
Next step
Coordinator follow-up
High-intent next step
The readiness quiz gives the team enough context to review budget, state-law, clinic, and matching questions before a coordinator call.