3
references checked
4.7/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.7/5 as of May 30, 2026.
Atlas · Comparison list
Texas reproductive attorney directory
Use this Texas comparison to decide which provider profiles to open first. Compare geography, role fit, public professional facts, and profile update paths. This directory is not an endorsement or legal advice.
8 providers included
Why these appear
These directories prioritize role clarity, geography, public professional facts, and an update path for outdated details. Provider inclusion is not a paid placement, endorsement, ranking, or legal recommendation.
✓Public facts can be checked from an accessible provider page, professional listing, or official record. ✓The profile can be connected to a state, metro, or service area. ✓Provider has a profile update path. ✓Displayed ratings include reference attribution, review count, and an as-of date.
The shortlist
Christine Henry Andresen Austin, TX · Austin → Alyssa Jacobs Fort Worth, TX · Dallas-Fort Worth → Carla M. Calabrese Dallas, TX · Dallas-Fort Worth → Eric C. Freeby Fort Worth, TX · Dallas-Fort Worth → Lori Anderson Austin, TX · Austin → Jenny L. Womack Dallas, TX · Dallas-Fort Worth → Provider facts
Reviewed public facts.
3
references checked
4.4/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.4/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
3.7/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 3.7/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
4.6/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.6/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
3.5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 3.5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
4.5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
Is this an endorsement?
No — Atlas comparison pages compile public facts reviewed by Patriot Conceptions to help you compare and shortlist. They are not endorsements, paid placements, medical advice, or legal advice. Verify pricing, experience, and policies directly with each provider, and use profile update links for outdated facts.
Provider comparison
Texas reproductive attorney directory
Use this Texas comparison to decide which provider profiles to open first. Compare geography, role fit, public professional facts, and profile update paths. This directory is not an endorsement or legal advice.
8
providers included
Reviewed
public facts
Open
profile update path
Comparison guide
Use comparisons as a shortlist, not an answer
The page should help visitors decide which profiles to open, what context to verify, and when to ask for planning support.
Scope 01
Use the list as a shortlist
Texas reproductive attorney directory is a starting point for which profiles to open first, not a provider recommendation.
Fit 02
Compare role and geography
Match each profile to state law context, clinic access, counsel needs, and travel assumptions behind the journey.
Open Atlas planning guide Review 03
Open profile references
Check profile pages for reviewed links, checked dates, and role-specific details before relying on a comparison row.
Read reference standards Action 04
Move from comparison to plan
Ask Patriot to connect the provider shortlist with cost, timing, legal, clinic, escrow, and insurance planning.
Start applicationInclusion criteria
Why these providers appear
These directories prioritize role clarity, geography, public professional facts, and an update path for outdated details. Provider inclusion is not a paid placement, endorsement, ranking, or legal recommendation.
Public facts can be checked from an accessible provider page, professional listing, or official record.
The profile can be connected to a state, metro, or service area.
Provider has a profile update path.
Displayed ratings include reference attribution, review count, and an as-of date.
Comparison
Provider comparison table
Atlas comparison pages are planning aids built from public facts reviewed by Patriot Conceptions. They are not endorsements, paid placements, medical advice, or legal advice. Use profile update links for outdated facts.
3
references checked
4.7/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.7/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
4.4/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.4/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
3.7/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 3.7/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
4.6/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.6/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
3.5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 3.5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
3
references checked
4.5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 4.5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
Reference standards
How provider information is checked
The Atlas joins public provider facts with reviewed reference links, checked dates, role-specific planning context, and an update workflow before public facts change.
Last checked 2026-06-02.
Provider pages show public facts, reviewed dates, and reference links in plain language.
Clinic outcomes stay separate from review ratings because case mix and patient history matter.
Attorney and evaluator pages never use clinic outcome fields as comparison metrics.
Profile updates go through the profile form before public facts change.
Budget, match, readiness
Move from provider comparison to a coordinator-reviewed plan
Use the comparison page to identify the questions worth asking, then let Patriot connect provider access with budget, law, clinic, escrow, insurance, and timing.
First step
Readiness quiz
Review
Coordinator-reviewed plan
Next step
Coordinator follow-up
High-intent next step
The readiness quiz gives the team enough context to review budget, state-law, clinic, and matching questions before a coordinator call.