Editorial planning plate for the Brian K. Esser Reproductive attorney profile

Reproductive attorney

Brian K. Esser

Brooklyn, NY. Public professional facts, source links, nearby provider context, and correction access. Legal fit still requires qualified counsel review.

Provider facts

What is checked on this profile

This profile is public information, not legal advice, counsel selection, paid placement, or an endorsement.

Status: Recently checked · 100% completeness

Role

Reproductive attorney

Location

Brooklyn, NY

Metro

New York City

Last checked

2026-05-30

Website

https://www.esserlawoffice.com

Phone

(718) 747-8447

Attributed signals

Google Business Profile 3.8/5 as of May 30, 2026

Attorney profiles show public professional facts and attributed Google context when available. Jurisdiction, representation, contract strategy, and parentage planning require qualified counsel.

Google 3.8/5 · 9 reviews · as of May 30, 2026

Report source correction

Google Business Profile

3.8/5

As of May 30, 2026
9 reviews
Open source

Profile correction

Claim or correct this profile

Providers can report outdated information, request attribution review, or ask Patriot to verify service-scope changes before profile text is updated.

You can also share who manages your third-party / gestational-carrier program and your current intake or screening guidelines. Every submission is reviewed before any public change; contact and screening details stay internal and are never published unverified.

Nearby context

Compare nearby provider facts

Fertility clinic

Extend Fertility

New York, NY · New York City

Location checked

4

sources reviewed

4.4/5

Google

1,231

CDC context

Google Business Profile 4.4/5 as of May 30, 2026 · CDC 2022: 1,231 cycles, SART yes.

Methodology

How provider information is checked

The Atlas joins public provider facts with reviewed source links, checked dates, role-specific context, and a correction workflow before public facts change.

Last checked 2026-06-02.

Provider pages show public facts, reviewed dates, and source links in plain language.

Clinic outcomes stay separate from review ratings because case mix and patient history matter.

Attorney and evaluator pages never use clinic outcome fields as comparison metrics.

Corrections route through the profile form before public facts change.