Google Business Profile
4.6/5
467 reviews
Open reference
Fertility clinic
Aspire Fertility - San Antonio (Prelude Network clinic)
San Antonio, TX. Public facts, attributed Google details, CDC clinic details when matched, nearby providers, and profile updates in one profile.
Provider facts
What is checked on this profile
This profile is public information, not an endorsement or personal outcome prediction.
Status: Location checked · 75% completeness
Role
Fertility clinic
Location
San Antonio, TX
Metro
San Antonio
Last checked
2026-05-30
Website
https://www.aspirefertility.com/san-antonio-texas
Phone
(210) 337-8453
Clinic route
Use this profile to test clinic access before matching decisions.
Clinic profiles are strongest when they connect public location facts, attributed Google details, CDC ART clinic details, and the next legal or insurance handoff.
CDC ART details matched
1,482
SART member: yes · reference checked Jun 2, 2026
Google 4.6/5 from 467 reviews
Lab accreditation: Yes
Location checked · May 30, 2026
Decision sequence
What to verify before relying on this profile
-
Access
Public website and contact lane available.
-
Clinic context
CDC 2022: 1,482 total ART cycles
-
Legal handoff
Use the state guide and counsel review before contract or transfer timing.
-
Financial review
Escrow, insurance, medication, and agency timing should be sequenced after clinic fit.
Confirm current monitoring access, transfer logistics, legal timing, escrow, and insurance review before treating the clinic as journey-ready.
Attributed signals
Google Business Profile 4.6/5 as of May 30, 2026
Attributed Google context and CDC ART outcomes are displayed with reference links and dates. Read CDC success rates as clinic-level context, not a prediction for any one patient.
Google 4.6/5 · 467 reviews · as of May 30, 2026
CDC 2022: 1,482 cycles · SART member Yes · lab accreditation Yes
SART membership and lab-accreditation status come from the CDC ART clinic report above. Patriot does not publish per-clinic SART success-rate tables, so we link the official CDC source instead of restating numbers.
Report reference updateCDC ART / SART
1,482 cycles
SART member
Yes
GC services
Yes
GC transfers
0.9%
Own-egg live birth per intended retrieval
<35
52.1%
263 retrievals
35-37
38.5%
135 retrievals
38-40
27.5%
153 retrievals
41+
9%
67 retrievals
CDC clinic outcomes are population-level context, not a personal prognosis. Patient age, diagnosis, treatment history, and clinic case mix matter.
Open CDC clinic reportReferences checked
Reviewed public references
aspirefertility.com
aspirefertility.com
Reviewed as of May 30, 2026
Google Maps listing
google.com
Reviewed as of May 30, 2026
CDC ART clinic report
art.cdc.gov
Reviewed as of May 30, 2026
Google Business Profile
Google Business Profile rating with reference attribution and as-of date.
Open external referenceProfile updates
Claim or update this profile
Providers can report outdated information, request attribution review, or ask Patriot to verify service-scope changes before profile text is updated.
You can also share who manages your third-party / gestational-carrier program and your current intake or screening guidelines. Every submission is reviewed before any public change; contact and screening details stay internal and are never published unverified.
Nearby context
Compare nearby provider facts
3
references checked
3.5/5
Counsel
legal fit
Google Business Profile 3.5/5 as of May 30, 2026.
2
references checked
4.3/5
Pending
CDC ART details
Google Business Profile 4.3/5 as of May 30, 2026.
2
references checked
3/5
Pending
CDC ART details
Google Business Profile 3/5 as of May 30, 2026.
2
references checked
No
Counsel
legal fit
Public facts checked; attributed review details are not shown yet.
Reference standards
How provider information is checked
The Atlas joins public provider facts with reviewed reference links, checked dates, role-specific planning context, and an update workflow before public facts change.
Last checked 2026-06-02.
Provider pages show public facts, reviewed dates, and reference links in plain language.
Clinic outcomes stay separate from review ratings because case mix and patient history matter.
Attorney and evaluator pages never use clinic outcome fields as comparison metrics.
Profile updates route through the profile form before public facts change.